Difference: ResultsPDG2016 (r2 vs. r1)

Fit results: PDG 2016

This fit is prepared with the inputsfor the Particle Data Group 2014 2016 Review.

ParameterFull fit
\bar{\rho} 0.142 \pm 0.020
\bar{\eta} 0.348 \pm 0.012
A 0.819 \pm 0.013
\lambda 0.22551 \pm 0.00045
J_{cp}, 10^{-5} 3.10 \pm 0.10
CKM matrix thus looks like V_{CKM}=\left(\begin{array}{ccc} (0.974177 \pm 0.000099) & (0.22563 \pm 0.00046) & (0.00364 \pm 0.00011)e^{i(-68.0 \pm 2.8)^\circ}\\ ( -0.22547 \pm 0.00046)e^{i(0.0348 \pm 0.0012)^\circ} & (0.97333 \pm 0.00010)e^{i(-0.001872 \pm 0.000061)^\circ} & (0.04178 \pm 0.00064) \\ (0.00871 \pm 0.00019)e^{i(-22.06 \pm 0.73)^\circ} & ( -0.04101 \pm 0.00065)e^{i(1.061 \pm 0.038)^\circ} & (0.999116 \pm 0.000026)\end{array}\right)



Full fit result for \,\bar{\rho}
0.142 \pm 0.020
95% prob:[0.102, 0.182]
99% prob:[0.084, 0.203]
EPS - PDF - PNG - JPG - GIF



Full fit result for \,\bar{\eta}
0.348 \pm 0.012
95% prob:[0.324, 0.373]
99% prob:[0.312, 0.387]
EPS - PDF - PNG - JPG - GIF



Full fit result for \,A
0.819 \pm 0.013
95% prob:[0.794, 0.846]
99% prob:[0.780, 0.858]
EPS - PDF - PNG - JPG - GIF



Full fit result for \,\lambda
0.22551 \pm 0.00045
95% prob:[0.22485, 0.22653]
99% prob:[0.22435, 0.22693]
EPS - PDF - PNG - JPG - GIF



Full fit result for \,J_{cp}, 10^{-5}
3.10 \pm 0.10
95% prob:[2.88, 3.30]
99% prob:[2.78, 3.42]
EPS - PDF - PNG - JPG - GIF

View topic | View difference side by side | History: r2 < r1 | More topic actions
 
  Powered by
Foswiki Ideas, requests, problems regarding this web site? Send feedback