Powered by Foswiki, The Free and Open Source Wiki

Difference: GammaFromTreesWinter2016 (r2 vs. r1)

Input parameters and combination results: Summer 2015 (post-EPS 2015)

We use the relevant pre-EPS 2015 HFAG averages as inputs.

The results of combination:

Parameter	Full fit
$\gamma [^{\circ}]$	$-108.5 \pm 6.5 \text{ and } 71.4 \pm 6.5$
$\delta_{B}(DK) [^{\circ}]$	$-55.6 \pm 7.7 \text{ and } 124.4 \pm 7.7$
$r_{B}(DK)$	$0.0991 \pm 0.0072$
$\delta_{B}(DK^{*}) [^{\circ}]$	$-53 \pm 36 \text{ and } 127 \pm 36$
$r_{B}(DK^{*})$	$0.125 \pm 0.056$
$\delta_{B}(D^{*}K) [^{\circ}]$	$-47 \pm 13 \text{ and } 133 \pm 13$
$r_{B}(D^{*}K)$	$0.119 \pm 0.018$
$\delta_{B0}(DK^{*0}) [^{\circ}]$	$-190 \pm 39 \text{ and } -10 \pm 39$
$r_{B0}(DK^{*0})$	$0.231 \pm 0.04$

History for for $\,\gamma [^{\circ}]$


EPS - PDF - PNG - JPG - GIF

Full fit result for $\,\gamma [^{\circ}]$

$-108.5 \pm 6.5 \text{ and } 71.4 \pm 6.5$ 95% prob:[-122, -95.] U [58., 85.] 99% prob:[-129, -89.] U [51., 91.]
EPS - PDF - PNG - JPG - GIF

Full fit result for $\,\delta_{B}(DK) [^{\circ}]$

$-55.6 \pm 7.7 \text{ and } 124.4 \pm 7.7$ 95% prob:[-71.5, -41.5] U [108.5, 138.5] 99% prob:[-80., -35.] U [100, 145]
EPS - PDF - PNG - JPG - GIF

Full fit result for $\,r_{B}(DK)$

$0.0991 \pm 0.0072$ 95% prob:[0.0869, 0.1117] 99% prob:[0.0805, 0.1184]
EPS - PDF - PNG - JPG - GIF

Full fit result for $\,\delta_{B}(DK^{*}) [^{\circ}]$

$-53 \pm 36 \text{ and } 127 \pm 36$ 95% prob:[-180, -176.] U [-142., 4.] U [38, 180] 99% prob:[-180, -165.] U [-162., 16] U [17.4, 180]
EPS - PDF - PNG - JPG - GIF

Full fit result for $\,r_{B}(DK^{*})$

$0.125 \pm 0.056$ 95% prob:[0.002, 0.213] 99% prob:[0, 0.264]
EPS - PDF - PNG - JPG - GIF

Full fit result for $\,\delta_{B}(D^{*}K) [^{\circ}]$

$-47 \pm 13 \text{ and } 133 \pm 13$ 95% prob:[-77.5, -23.7] U [102.5, 156.3] 99% prob:[-99.2, -13.5] U [80.8, 166.5]
EPS - PDF - PNG - JPG - GIF

Full fit result for $\,r_{B}(D^{*}K)$

$0.119 \pm 0.018$ 95% prob:[0.082, 0.153] 99% prob:[0.059, 0.168]
EPS - PDF - PNG - JPG - GIF

too many splits for range

Full fit result for $\,\delta_{B0}(DK^{*0}) [^{\circ}]$

$-190 \pm 39 \text{ and } -10 \pm 39$ 95% prob:[-270, -112] U [-92, 68.] 99% prob:[-270, 76.] U [79., 90.]
EPS - PDF - PNG - JPG - GIF

Full fit result for $\,r_{B0}(DK^{*0})$

$0.231 \pm 0.04$ 95% prob:[0.139, 0.304] 99% prob:[0.056, 0.337]
EPS - PDF - PNG - JPG - GIF

View topic | View difference side by side | History: r4 < r3 < r2 < r1 | More topic actions

Powered by

Ideas, requests, problems regarding this web site? Send feedback