Difference: GammaFromTreesPostMoriond2014 (r2 vs. r1)

-- Input parameters and combination results: Summer 2014 (post-Moriond 2014)DenisDerkach - 10 Jun 2014

We use the relevant post-Moriond 2014 HFAG averages as inputs.

The results of combination:

Full fit result for $\,\gamma [^{\circ}]$

$-111.7 \pm 7.5 \text{ and } 68.3 \pm 7.5$ 95% prob:[-126, -97.] U [53, 83] 99% prob:[-134, -89.] U [46, 91]
EPS - PDF - PNG - JPG - GIF

Full fit result for $\,\delta_{B}(DK) [^{\circ}]$

$-62.0 \pm 8.8 \text{ and } 118.0 \pm 8.8$ 95% prob:[-80.1, -45.5] U [99.9, 134.5] 99% prob:[-89.2, -38.3] U [90.9, 141.7]
EPS - PDF - PNG - JPG - GIF

Full fit result for $\,\delta_{B}(DK^{*}) [^{\circ}]$

$-53 \pm 34 \text{ and } 126 \pm 34$ 95% prob:[-180, -176.] U [-141, 3] U [38.8, 180] 99% prob:[-180, -166.] U [-161., 180]
EPS - PDF - PNG - JPG - GIF

Full fit result for $\,\delta_{B}(D^{*}K) [^{\circ}]$

$-49 \pm 13 \text{ and } 131 \pm 13$ 95% prob:[-78.7, -24.3] U [101.3, 155.7] 99% prob:[-99.3, -14.1] U [80.7, 165.9]
EPS - PDF - PNG - JPG - GIF

Full fit result for $\,\delta_{B0}(DK^{*0}) [^{\circ}]$

$-53 \pm 47 \text{ and } 126 \pm 47$ 95% prob:[-180, -168] U [-153., 12.6] U [26.8, 180] 99% prob:[-180, -161.] U [-159., 180]
EPS - PDF - PNG - JPG - GIF

2D PDFs for the $B_{u}\rightarrow DK^{+}$ system:

2D PDFs for the $B_{u}\rightarrow DK^{*+}$ system:

2D PDFs for the $B_{u}\rightarrow D^{*}K^{+}$ system:

2D PDFs for the $B_{d}\rightarrow DK^{*0}$ system:

Ideas, requests, problems regarding this web site? Send feedback