First evidence of New Physics in Bs sector


Reference paper: M. Bona et al. [UTfit Collaboration], "First Evidence of New Physics in b <--> s Transitions" arXiv:0803.0659

We are much indebted to Marco Rescigno, for triggering this analysis and for improving it with several suggestions. We also thank G. Punzi, D. Zieminska and G. Giurgiu for their assistance with the Tevatron experimental results.


We perform an analysis in which New Physics contributions with arbitrary phase is allowed in all sectors (NP in the mixing between the 1-2, 1-3 and 2-3 families), as described in hep-ph/0701204.
We thus obtain a model-independent determination of the CKM parameters ρ and η.
We also determine the |ΔF|=2 amplitudes, which can be used to test any extension of the SM. In particular, combining all the available experimental information, with the UTfit method, we find evidence of a Bs mixing phase larger than what expected in the SM, with a significance exceeding 3σ.

In the following we sketch the method and results which are detailed in arXiv:0803.0659.

The NP contributions to Bs mixing are parametrized using the following general expression:
CBs  e2 i φBs =
< Bs|Hefffull|Bs >

< Bs|HeffSM|Bs >
=
AsSM e-2iβs+ AsNP e2i(φsNPs)

AsSM e-2iβs

where HeffSM includes only the SM box diagram, while Hefffull includes also the NP contributions. These definitions imply that the mass differences and the CP asymmetry are related to the SM counterparts by

Δms=CBs ⋅ ΔmsSM
βsexp = βs - φBs

The SM phase βs is defined as βs=arg(-(VtsVtb*)/(VcsVcb*)) and it is equal to (1.03 ± 0.06)o in the SM.
Recent experimental developments are now allowing for dramatic improvements in the Bs sector. We use the following experimental inputs:

We recall here that &Phis=2(&betas-&phiBs).

Results

The results of the analysis are summarized in the table below and the 68% and 95% probability regions obtained for CBs, ΦBs, CBs vs ΦBs, AsNP / AsSM, ΦsNP and AsNP / AsSM vs ΦsNP are shown in the figures.



C(B_s)
(EPS) [JPG]


Φ(B_s)
(EPS) [JPG]

RESULT:
CBs = 1.07 ± 0.29
RESULT:
ΦBs = (-19.9 ± 5.6)oU(-68.2 ± 4.9)o

Phi(B_s)vsC(B_s)
(EPS) [JPG]



As_NP/As_SM
(EPS) [JPG]


Φ_sNP
(EPS) [JPG]

RESULT:
AsNP / AsSM= (0.73 ± 0.35)U(1.87 ± 0.06)
RESULT:
ΦsNP = (-51 ± 11)oU(-79 ± 3)o

As_NP/As_SM vs Φ_sNP
(EPS) [JPG]




Results
Parameter
68% probability Region
95% probability Region
&PhiBs[o]
(-19.9 ± 5.6)U(-68.2 ± 4.9) [-30.45,-9.29]U[-78.45,-58.2]
CBs
1.07 ± 0.29 [0.62,1.93]
&PhisNP[o]
(-51 ± 11)U(-79 ± 3) [-69,-27]U[-84,-71]
AsNP / AsSM
(0.73 ± 0.35)U(1.87 ± 0.06) [0.24,1.38]U[1.50,2.47]


The result for the phase &PhiBs deviates from zero at 3.7 σ.
Although the procedure to combine the available measurements still depends on some assumptions, different analyses performed with alternative choices always show a deviation of the value of &PhiBs from zero of at least 3σ, as it is detailed in arXiv:0803.0659.
We conclude that the combined analysis of the available experimental information gives a stable evidence of NP.